• The proposal for the permanent deployment of U.S. Patriot missile defense batteries in Palau has sparked controversy amid concerns about China's expanding influence in the Pacific.
  • The U.S. previously initiated the construction of an over-the-horizon radar system in Palau.
  • Palau's Senate passed a resolution in November rejecting the missile deployment, citing historical sensitivities as a World War II battleground.

A proposal for permanent deployment of U.S. Patriot missile defense batteries in Palau in response to China's expanding reach in the Pacific has come under fire as the nation's politicians debate the move ahead of elections next year.

The United States has begun work on an over-the-horizon radar system in Palau and the island nation's president, Surangel Whipps, says he has asked Washington to install the missile shield given fears that hosting the radar could endanger the archipelago's 18,000 residents.

However, in late November, the Senate in Palau, where the population is sensitive to the islands' history as a bloody battleground in World War Two, passed a resolution rejecting the deployment. The lower house of parliament has yet to consider the issue.


The Senate vote came after Whipps announced in September that the U.S. and Palau were discussing permanent deployment of Patriots, as hosting the radar system made his nation of 340 islands halfway between the Philippines and Guam a potential target in any conflict.

Soldier inspects missile

A U.S soldier inspects a Patriot missile defense battery during join exercises at military grounds in Sochaczew, near Warsaw, on March 21, 2015. (REUTERS/Franciszek Mazur/Agencja Gazeta/File Photo)

Patriots will also help protect the new radar system, which is expected to be operational in 2026 to boost U.S. capabilities as China expands its military operations in the Pacific.

The U.S. has already temporarily deployed Patriot systems in Palau and test-fired them during exercises.

A Pentagon spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


In a statement to Reuters, Whipps' office said it hoped Palau Senate members "understand that in these tumultuous times it is good to have a defense system for Palau and her people that can respond immediately to a threat."

Under the terms of long-standing agreements, the United States is responsible for the defense of Palau, Micronesia and the Marshall Islands and provides economic assistance, while gaining exclusive military access to strategic swathes of the Pacific.

 In October, BenarNews, an affiliate of Radio Free Asia, quoted Hokkons Baules, the president of Palau's Senate, as saying that U.S. interests rather than Palau's were served by a military buildup in the country.

In a statement to Reuters, Baules said that Palau should not be asking for the permanent basing of weapons.

   "Permanent basing of purely military weapons in the Republic of Palau is not consistent with our nation’s history as an independent country, and not consistent with any current threats to Palau’s sovereignty or security," Baules said.

Such opposition has brought suggestions of Chinese interference.

   Whipps told Washington's Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) think tank in July that China was actively wooing politicians in Palau and described the speaker of the House and president of the Senate as "very supportive of China."

Baules, who failed to win Senate support in 2017 for a resolution to establish trade ties with China, told Reuters the missile resolution was "not about China."

He said he had "consistently supported building economic ties with all nations, including China."


Chinese Embassy spokesperson Liu Pengyu in Washington, in response to a Reuters request for comment, said "China believes that relevant parties need to contribute to the peace, development and stability in the Pacific island countries."

Cleo Paskal, an expert on the Pacific islands at FDD, said the issue of missile deployment was highly charged given elections due to be held in Palau in the latter half of 2024.

She said the U.S. case was not helped by the failure so far by the U.S. Congress to approve new 20-year funding programs for Palau, Micronesia and the Marshall Islands, due to budget squabbling between Republicans and Democrats in Washington.

The delay in congressional approval has created a particularfunding crunch for Palau.

"For those that are pushing 'the U.S. is making us a target of a military target and isn't helping with our schools or health care system,' this plays right into that argument," Paskal said.